Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR Compliance

APEX-Agents · Law

LawWorld433_ANB_01

3/3Pass

APEX-Agents task LawWorld433_ANB_01 in AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR Compliance. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Privacy and GDPR ComplianceLaw World 433Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_de1ec76029b54126ae1105921e4202d4
Law World 433
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Susan Whitaker has filed three successive Complaints against Magnolia Gardens. The first is the original Complaint, the second Is the First Amended Complaint, and the third is the Second Amended Complaint. Each Complaint was served on the defendant ten days after they were filed. Magnolia Gardens wants to file a Motion to Dismiss the breach of contract allegations in the Complaint. Review the complaints and decide if, under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a.3, what is the last day the motion to dismiss can be timely filed? When was the original complaint served? Give me your answer right here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual3/3Pass
fireworks models Kimi K2dual3/3Pass
Gemini 3 Flashdual3/3Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal3/3Pass
GPT-5.4dual3/3Pass
GPT-5.4 minidual3/3Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual3/3Pass

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States the last date the Motion to Dismiss can be filed is August 6, 2025

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states, “the last day Magnolia Gardens could timely file the Rule 91a motion... was August 6, 2025” and “Rule 91a motion deadline August 6, 2025.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating the last date is August 6, 2025; pass.

  2. States the breach of contract allegation was first raised in the original complaint

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states, “The Original Complaint... already contained the breach-of-contract cause of action” and identifies “V. CAUSE OF ACTION – BREACH OF CONTRACT.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating the breach of contract allegation was first raised in the original complaint; pass.

  3. States the original complaint was served on June 7, 2025

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states, “the Original Complaint was served on June 7, 2025” and in the final answer, “Original Complaint served June 7, 2025.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating the original complaint was served on June 7, 2025; pass.