Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring

APEX-Agents · Law

Reconcile Compensation, Fee, and Cost Allocation Provisions Across All JV Documents

1/1Pass

APEX-Agents task Reconcile Compensation, Fee, and Cost Allocation Provisions Across All JV Documents in AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal StructuringLaw World 418Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_43ab089534f243eba52ee023a0508ac2
Law World 418
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

BlueAnchor served BlueLNG with a notice claiming to exercise its put rights pursuant to the BlueLNG Operating Agreement. Can you please review the OA and confirm whether or not BlueAnchor can actually exercise this right? Write back to me your findings. Only consider the Operating Agreement in your analysis.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual1/1Pass
fireworks models Kimi K2dual1/1Pass
Gemini 3 Flashdual1/1Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal1/1Pass
GPT-5.4dual0/1Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual1/1Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/1Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that Blue Anchor cannot exercise its put rights under the Operating Agreement

    Pass

    Evidence: The response states, “I would not treat BlueAnchor’s notice as an effective exercise of a presently exercisable put right” and “BlueAnchor cannot, based on the OA as written, force BlueLNG/LNG Shipping to purchase its interest simply by serving a notice.” Assessment: The criterion asks whether the response states that BlueAnchor cannot exercise its put rights under the Operating Agreement. Pass, because the response clearly concludes the put right is not presently exercisable under the OA.