Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring

APEX-Agents · Law

Task jdgh600b

0/3Fail

APEX-Agents task Task jdgh600b in AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal StructuringLaw World 418Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_2b7ec4e367344236a14da9094c8d1019
Law World 418
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Can you respond to me, giving a one or two sentence answer to each of the following questions: 1) what is the key principle regarding information exchange from the Joint Venture Antitrust Slides? 2) what mechanisms, if any, does the JV Agreement and Operating Agreement provide to ensure that LNG Shipping's involvement in BlueLNG JV doesn't violate this principle?

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/3Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual0/3Fail
Gemini 3 Flashdual3/3Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal3/3Pass
GPT-5.4dual0/3Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual1/3Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual1/3Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the key principle regarding information exchange is the following: information exchange between a joint venture and its partners should be restricted if the joint venture competes with one or both of its partners

    Fail

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says, “JV partners should not use the JV to exchange competitively sensitive information in areas where they still compete” and sharing should be limited to what is necessary. Assessment: The criterion requires stating that information exchange between a JV and its partners should be restricted if the JV competes with one or both partners. The response captures a related antitrust restriction, but frames the competition as areas where the partners still compete, not where the JV competes with its partner(s). Fail.

  2. States that the JV Agreement does not contain any mechanisms to ensure that LNG Shipping's involvement in BlueLNG JV does not violate the principle regarding information exchange

    Fail

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says the “agreements provide partial safeguards” and that LNG Shipping’s role is tied to a “Board-approved, arm’s-length ship management arrangement,” while noting no “tailored antitrust firewall” was found. Assessment: The criterion requires stating that the JV Agreement does not contain any mechanisms to ensure compliance with the information-exchange principle. The response instead identifies a JV Agreement provision as a partial safeguard, so it does not state the required conclusion. Fail.

  3. States that the Operating Agreement does not contain any mechanisms to ensure that LNG Shipping's involvement in BlueLNG JV does not violate the principle regarding information exchange

    Fail

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says the Operating Agreement “restricts access to confidential information” and permits disclosure “only for the Company’s purpose,” calling these “partial safeguards,” though not a tailored antitrust firewall. Assessment: The criterion requires stating that the Operating Agreement does not contain any mechanisms to ensure compliance. The response says the opposite in part by identifying confidentiality restrictions as mechanisms that reduce risk. Fail.