APEX-Agents · Management Consulting
W134 Nancy Task 07
APEX-Agents task W134 Nancy Task 07 in AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.
Task prompt
What the agent was asked to do
The LATAM market customer count is expected to continue growing at its 2024-2025B CAGR. Complisure could capture a quarter to half of the two largest LatAm players’ latest share of customers if they were to expand into that the region. I am defining the largest LatAm players by their number of LatAm customers. What would you forecast CompliSure’s 2030 revenue range, given this upside? Remember: - Refer to the five-year forecast file for the original 2030 revenue estimate. - Assume each competitor's contract size is the same for all of their customers based on 2025B figures and does not change over time. - Round the answer to the nearest thousand. Reply to me with your answer back in here.
Published trajectories
Agent runs on this task
Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.
| Model | Harness | Score | Result | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5showcase | dual | 0/2 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | dual | 0/2 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 | dual | 0/2 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 mini | dual | 0/2 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 nano | dual | 2/2 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
Grading rubric
Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)
States the low end of Complisure's updated 2030 revenue is $73,447,000
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> states “$86,979,000 to $92,363,000” and says this includes original 2030 revenue plus LatAm upside. Assessment: Criterion requires stating the low end is $73,447,000; the response states $86,979,000 instead, so it fails.
States the high end of Complisure's updated 2030 revenue is $78,830,000
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> states “$86,979,000 to $92,363,000.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating the high end is $78,830,000; the response states $92,363,000 instead, so it fails.