Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Automotive EV Transition Strategy

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World 127_AH_Task 1

0/10Fail

APEX-Agents task World 127_AH_Task 1 in AI Agents for Automotive EV Transition Strategy. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Automotive EV Transition StrategyManagement Consulting World 127Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_e2b897ff18fe4f16a0c969cf70ad2766
Management Consulting World 127
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Update numbers with the new projections (attached). I want the full breakdown for: DC converters and onboard chargers Driveline and axle modules Engine control units Engine core hardware Exhaust and emissions Fuel and injection systems On vehicle charging hardware Power electronics and inverters Sensors and wiring Structural EV content Thermal management modules Transmission and e drive Ignore sensors and structural EV content. Round final numbers to two decimals, and reply just straight back in here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/10Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal0/10Fail
GPT-5.4dual0/10Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual0/10Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/10Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the component growth rate for Exhaust and emissions is -2.42%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists Exhaust and emissions values (e.g., 2025 "5,901,569.00" through 2030 "5,793,462.42") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is -2.42%; this is not stated. Fail.

  2. States that the component growth rate for Engine core hardware is -2.54%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists Engine core hardware values (2025 "7,038,638.00" through 2030 "7,277,125.83") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is -2.54%; this is not stated. Fail.

  3. States that the component growth rate for Fuel and injection systems is 0.28%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists Fuel and injection systems values (2025 "6,547,106.00" through 2030 "7,261,060.47") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is 0.28%; this is not stated. Fail.

  4. States that the component growth rate for Engine control units is -0.63%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists Engine control units values (2025 "72,904,384.00" through 2030 "72,441,885.79") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is -0.63%; this is not stated. Fail.

  5. States that the component growth rate for Driveline and axle modules is -0.54%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists Driveline and axle modules values (2025 "14,383,085.00" through 2030 "15,221,359.96") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is -0.54%; this is not stated. Fail.

  6. States that the component growth rate for Transmission and e drive is -0.16%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists Transmission and e drive values (2025 "14,001,934.00" through 2030 "14,707,260.04") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is -0.16%; this is not stated. Fail.

  7. States that the component growth rate for Power electronics and inverters is -2.15%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists Power electronics and inverters values (2025 "4,999,494.00" through 2030 "5,298,373.49") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is -2.15%; this is not stated. Fail.

  8. States that the component growth rate for DC converters and onboard chargers is 0.87%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists DC converters and onboard chargers values (2025 "12,595,870.00" through 2030 "12,436,729.07") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is 0.87%; this is not stated. Fail.

  9. States that the component growth rate for Thermal management modules is -1.81%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists Thermal management modules values (2025 "14,207,985.00" through 2030 "13,781,944.84") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is -1.81%; this is not stated. Fail.

  10. States that the component growth rate for On vehicle charging hardware is 0.99%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> lists On vehicle charging hardware values (2025 "12,863,467.00" through 2030 "13,391,024.09") but no percentage growth rate. Assessment: The criterion requires stating the component growth rate is 0.99%; this is not stated. Fail.