APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World 127_AH_Task 2

8/8Pass

APEX-Agents task World 127_AH_Task 2 in AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory Review. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Cross-Border Regulatory ReviewManagement Consulting World 127Dual harnessGrader: rubric

Task IDtask_47f6033c9a1d4a38af9edf059793720b

WorldManagement Consulting World 127

Expected outputmessage_in_console

Published runs5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

You are analyzing the results from the customer survey. The survey asked what Helios' top 3 capabilities are. The initial results came back incomplete, and there are now additional responses available to analyze (attached). Your goal is to calculate what percentage of all total responses each capability received. Only calculate these values for respondents who responded "Slightly Important" or "Not Important" for question 2. You may also utilize the survey questions file for reference. Round final answers to two decimal places please. Send your reply here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

Model	Harness	Score	Result	Links
GPT-5.5showcase	dual	8/8	Pass	Share page Public trace
Gemini 3.1 Pro	dual	0/8	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4	dual	8/8	Pass	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 mini	dual	8/8	Pass	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 nano	dual	8/8	Pass	Share page Public trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

States that the value for Advanced power electronics engineering is 16.29%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “Advanced power electronics engineering | 290 | 16.29%”. Assessment: Criterion requires stating value is 16.29%; pass.
States that the value for Thermal management expertise is 3.71%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “Thermal management expertise | 66 | 3.71%”. Assessment: Criterion requires stating value is 3.71%; pass.
States that the value for High-precision manufacturing is 11.57%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “High-precision manufacturing | 206 | 11.57%”. Assessment: Criterion requires stating value is 11.57%; pass.
States that the value for Software & controls development is 10.51%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “Software & controls development | 187 | 10.51%”. Assessment: Criterion requires stating value is 10.51%; pass.
States that the value for System integration / co-design capability is 15.62%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “System integration / co-design capability | 278 | 15.62%”. Assessment: Criterion requires stating value is 15.62%; pass.
States that the value for Cost competitiveness is 6.46%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “Cost competitiveness | 115 | 6.46%”. Assessment: Criterion requires stating value is 6.46%; pass.
States that the value for Quality & reliability engineering is 16.69%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “Quality & reliability engineering | 297 | 16.69%”. Assessment: Criterion requires stating value is 16.69%; pass.
States that the value for Global manufacturing + delivery footprint is 19.16%
Pass
Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE table lists “Global manufacturing + delivery footprint | 341 | 19.16%”. Assessment: Criterion requires stating value is 19.16%; pass.