Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Automotive EV Transition Strategy

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World 127 TJ Task 2.0

0/4Fail

APEX-Agents task World 127 TJ Task 2.0 in AI Agents for Automotive EV Transition Strategy. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Automotive EV Transition StrategyManagement Consulting World 127Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_8e592b2a3061410ebafea3183c960ff9
Management Consulting World 127
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Let's model the impact of the price war in the EV charging space. There is an 8% reduction in the ASP for 'on vehicle charging hardware' across all three scenarios. We need to recalculate the revenue (€) in the core calculation spreadsheet and then show how much component-level and scenario-wise revenue (€) the client could lose from 2026 to 2030 due to this reduction. This 8% reduction occurs at the ASP/year level, and does not compound year-over-year. This occurs in addition to any other yearly price changes. Output your results right here as a short message. Give values in the complete dollars and cents.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/4Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal0/4Fail
GPT-5.4dual0/4Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual0/4Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/4Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the total 5-year revenue lost in the 'on vehicle charging hardware' component family is €5,148,773,894.47

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> states “Total potential revenue loss: €5,148,789,222.73” for on vehicle charging hardware. Assessment: Criterion requires stating €5,148,773,894.47; the stated value differs, so fail.

  2. States that the total 5-year revenue loss in the exit scenario including all 14 component families is €1,866,336,376.30

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Exit “Revenue lost” as “€1,866,343,735.21.” Assessment: Criterion requires the total 5-year revenue loss in the exit scenario including all 14 component families to be €1,866,336,376.30; the stated value differs, so fail.

  3. States that the total 5-year revenue loss in the retain scenario including all 14 component families is €1,421,272,290.49

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Retain “Revenue lost” as “€1,421,275,902.61.” Assessment: Criterion requires €1,421,272,290.49 for the retain scenario including all 14 component families; the stated value differs, so fail.

  4. States that the total 5-year revenue loss in the transition scenario (including all 14 component families) is €1,861,165,227.68

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Transition “Revenue lost” as “€1,861,169,584.91.” Assessment: Criterion requires €1,861,165,227.68 for the transition scenario including all 14 component families; the stated value differs, so fail.