APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World 127 TJ Task 3.0

3/6Fail

APEX-Agents task World 127 TJ Task 3.0 in AI Agents for Infrastructure Finance. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Infrastructure FinanceManagement Consulting World 127Dual harnessGrader: rubric

Task IDtask_1d41b5f121724ec6bd9e22efba29f969

WorldManagement Consulting World 127

Expected outputmessage_in_console

Published runs5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Let's calculate how much capex is not spent due to supply chain delays and how that affects Helios' total cash position. Based on the assumption that only 80% of capex is spent during 2026-2027, the remaining 20% stays as cash, earning 3% interest per year until 2030. Use the capex requirements (2026 - 2030) from the scenario summary in the 5 year business case model for Helios. Output your conclusion as a message to me. Round to 2 decimal places.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

Model	Harness	Score	Result	Links
GPT-5.5showcase	dual	3/6	Fail	Share page Public trace
Gemini 3.1 Pro	dual	0/6	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4	dual	6/6	Pass	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 mini	dual	3/6	Fail	Share page Public trace
GPT-5.4 nano	dual	0/6	Fail	Share page Public trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

States that the Capex (€) shortfall in the retain scenario is €800,000.00
Pass
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Retain “Capex Not Spent (20%)” as “€0.80M.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating the retain Capex shortfall is €800,000.00; €0.80M is equivalent, so pass.
States that the Capex (€) shortfall in the transition scenario is €99,000,000.00
Pass
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Transition “Capex Not Spent (20%)” as “€99.00M,” and conclusion says “preserve €99.00M of capex.” Assessment: Criterion requires €99,000,000.00; €99.00M is equivalent, so pass.
States that the Capex (€) shortfall in the exit scenario is €5,000,000.00
Pass
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Exit “Capex Not Spent (20%)” as “€5.00M.” Assessment: Criterion requires €5,000,000.00; €5.00M is equivalent, so pass.
States that the total 5-year cash flow gain (€), including both unspent capex and accumulated interest income in the retain scenario, is €887,294.32
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Retain “2030 Cash Uplift” as “€0.89M” and interest as “€0.09M.” Assessment: Criterion requires the total 5-year cash flow gain to be €887,294.32. The response does not state this exact euro-and-cent amount; €0.89M is only an approximate million-denominated figure, so fail.
States that the total 5-year cash flow gain (€), including both unspent capex and accumulated interest income in the exit scenario, is €5,594,762.24
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Exit “2030 Cash Uplift” as “€5.59M.” Assessment: Criterion requires €5,594,762.24. The response gives an approximate value in millions rather than the required rounded-to-cents amount, so fail.
States that the total 5-year cash flow gain (€), including both unspent capex and accumulated interest income in the transition scenario, is €109,851,845.31
Fail
Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Transition “2030 Cash Uplift” as “€109.85M,” and conclusion repeats “€109.85M.” Assessment: Criterion requires €109,851,845.31. The response does not state this precise amount, only an approximate million-denominated value, so fail.