Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Divestiture and Spin-Off Analysis

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World 129_CY_Task 2

0/3Fail

APEX-Agents task World 129_CY_Task 2 in AI Agents for Divestiture and Spin-Off Analysis. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Divestiture and Spin-Off AnalysisManagement Consulting World 129Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_4bdc188e9a7f4860b818c3cb3013e676
Management Consulting World 129
message_in_console
6 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Refer to the latest (v1.0) customer segmentation data and the final pricing model. Calculate the % change of Customer Segmentation expected revenue (use target customers and average ARR for the pricing) relative to Configuration A expected revenue (use target customers and effective pricing) for each segment. Account for churn in both scenarios based on each scenario's respective data source. Reply with your results here, with final numbers rounded to the nearest 0.01%.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/3Fail
Gemini 3 Flashdual3/3Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal3/3Pass
GPT-5.4dual3/3Pass
GPT-5.4 minidual3/3Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual3/3Pass

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the percentage change of Customer Segmentation expected revenue relative to Configuration A expected revenue for SMB is 51.82%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists SMB “% Change vs. Config A” as “-96.16%.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating SMB percentage change is 51.82%; the response gives a different value, so fail.

  2. States that the percentage change of Customer Segmentation expected revenue relative to Configuration A expected revenue for Mid-Market is -49.17%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Mid-Market “% Change vs. Config A” as “-90.82%.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Mid-Market percentage change is -49.17%; the response gives a different value, so fail.

  3. States that the percentage change of Customer Segmentation expected revenue relative to Configuration A expected revenue for Enterprise is -91.40%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Enterprise “% Change vs. Config A” as “-90.54%.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Enterprise percentage change is -91.40%; the response gives a different value, so fail.