Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence

APEX-Agents · Investment Banking

World_223_IL_01

0/1Fail

APEX-Agents task World_223_IL_01 in AI Agents for M&A Legal Due Diligence. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for M&A Legal Due DiligenceInvestment Banking World 223Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_1b4e8b477170491287e72bdd45eb4763
Investment Banking World 223
message_in_console
4 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Solventum (SOLV) announced a $2.0 billion strategic expansion funded with 70% debt and 30% equity, which caused its share price to increase by 5% relative to the closing price on 11/18/2025. Using the most recent accretion/dilution model rerun scenario 1, assuming the updated SOLV share price. Determine the revised premium 3M would pay under the updated assumptions to keep EPS accretion flat relative to the level from the original 30% premium case. Write back to me with what I requested. In the output, round the percentage to two decimal places.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/1Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal0/1Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual0/1Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/1Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the revised premium 3M would pay under the updated assumptions to keep EPS accretion flat relative to the level from the original 30% premium case is 2.68%

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> says, “The revised premium 3M would pay is **9.29%**.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating the revised premium is 2.68%; the response states 9.29%, so it fails.