Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for FDA and Pharma Promotional Compliance

APEX-Agents · Law

World 420_LB_02

2/3Fail

APEX-Agents task World 420_LB_02 in AI Agents for FDA and Pharma Promotional Compliance. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for FDA and Pharma Promotional ComplianceLaw World 420Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_1918e229773b46699fe5576f1b11d7a2
Law World 420
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Identify for each item below whether it could be used by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as evidence that Bencontra is intended by Livyra for use in pediatric patients: 1. bencontra_provider_contact List.xlsx 2. Livyra sales representatives disseminating to doctors unaltered reprints from peer-reviewed medical journals that discuss use of Bencontra in pediatric patients 3. BENCONTRA - dosage - children.pdf, if disseminated to doctors alongside a source publication supporting the dosage recommendations For each item, be sure to specify clearly whether it “could” or “could not” be used by the FDA as evidence that Bencontra is intended by Livyra for use in pediatric patients. Alternatively, if the answer cannot be determined without more information, please say that and explain what additional information is needed. Otherwise, no explanation is needed. Provide your response in a message to the console. Please consider the following additional sources when responding: 1. 21 CFR 201.128.pdf 2. Guidance from FDA on Unapproved Uses.pdf

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual2/3Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual1/3Fail
Gemini 3 Flashdual3/3Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal2/3Fail
GPT-5.4dual2/3Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual3/3Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual2/3Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration could use Livyra’s provider contact list as evidence that Bencontra is intended for use in pediatric patients

    Pass

    Evidence: The response states, “`bencontra_provider_contact List.xlsx` — **could** be used.” Assessment: This directly satisfies the criterion that it states FDA could use Livyra’s provider contact list as evidence of intended pediatric use. Pass.

  2. States that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration could use the dissemination by Livyra sales representatives of unaltered reprints from peer-reviewed medical journals that discuss the use of Bencontra in pediatric patients as evidence that Bencontra is intended for use in pediatric patients

    Fail

    Evidence: For the journal reprints, the response states “**cannot be determined without more information**” and adds that “If it did [satisfy FDA’s SIUU guidance] ... otherwise, it **could** be used.” Assessment: The criterion requires stating that FDA could use the dissemination of unaltered reprints as evidence. The response instead gives an indeterminate/conditional answer, not the required clear “could” statement. Fail.

  3. States that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration could use the dissemination by Livyra sales representatives of the pediatric dosage sheet alongside a source publication as evidence that Bencontra is intended for use in pediatric patients

    Pass

    Evidence: The response states, “`BENCONTRA - dosage - children.pdf`, if disseminated to doctors alongside a source publication supporting the dosage recommendations — **could** be used.” Assessment: This directly satisfies the criterion that it states FDA could use dissemination of the pediatric dosage sheet alongside a source publication as evidence of intended pediatric use. Pass.