APEX-Agents · Management Consulting
World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_04
APEX-Agents task World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_04 in AI Agents for Digital Transformation. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.
Task prompt
What the agent was asked to do
Calculate the Adjusted Cost of Instability for each site, defined as Abnormal scrap cost/(Actual Scrap %−Normal Scrap %) = adjusted cost of instability. The target scrap rate of HarFeast is the minimum in the range of acceptable scrap rate in the scrap rate report. Just use COGS per ton as your scrap cost for now. Report your final answers to me in a message. Round values to the nearest dollar.
Published trajectories
Agent runs on this task
Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.
| Model | Harness | Score | Result | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5showcase | dual | 0/5 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | dual | 0/5 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 | dual | 0/5 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 mini | dual | 0/5 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 nano | dual | 0/5 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
Grading rubric
Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)
States that the adjusted cost of instability for Rockford, Illinois plant is $246,873,668
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “Rockford, Illinois Plant | $252,248,221.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Rockford is $246,873,668; the response gives a different value, so fail.
States that the adjusted cost of instability for Madison, Wisconsin plant is $199,836,340
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “Madison, Wisconsin Plant | $205,106,414.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Madison is $199,836,340; the response gives a different value, so fail.
States that the adjusted cost of instability for Cedar Rapids, Iowa plant is $243,560,709
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant | $248,605,950.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Cedar Rapids is $243,560,709; the response gives a different value, so fail.
States that the adjusted cost of instability for Toledo, Ohio plant is $230,836,061
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “Toledo, Ohio Plant | $237,106,441.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Toledo is $230,836,061; the response gives a different value, so fail.
States that the adjusted cost of instability for Kalamazoo, Michigan plant is $232,003,983
FailEvidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states “Kalamazoo, Michigan Plant | $236,361,510.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Kalamazoo is $232,003,983; the response gives a different value, so fail.