Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Digital Transformation

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_1

0/9Fail

APEX-Agents task World130_Al-Zhoheir_Hajim_1 in AI Agents for Digital Transformation. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Digital TransformationManagement Consulting World 130Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_3d4d03776d704758bb1bb9931e301b1c
Management Consulting World 130
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

1. Give me the total labor cost for each plant location. 2. Give me the efficiency gains for each plant location. West North Central division plant locations only have a 10% annual efficiency gain from labor cost. For other locations, the efficiency gain is 20%. However, the efficiency gain is 5% for non-unionized production supervisors no matter where they are located. 3. Give me the forecasted increase in annual labor cost as a result of union demand. All union members in the East North Central division plant locations other than production supervisors are demanding a 5% increase in annual pay. The rest of the union members in all locations are asking for an 8% increase in annual pay. Write your answers here with everything I requested, rounded to the nearest dollar. Ignore any plants in Ohio and Michigan for all questions.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/9Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal3/9Fail
GPT-5.4dual0/9Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual3/9Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual3/9Fail

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the Total Annual Labor Cost ($) for Rockford, Illinois Plant is $303,760

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Rockford total labor cost is "$1,036,465". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Rockford total annual labor cost is $303,760; fail because the stated amount differs.

  2. States that the Total Annual Labor Cost ($) for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is $402,330

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Madison total labor cost is "$824,662". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Madison total annual labor cost is $402,330; fail because the stated amount differs.

  3. States that the Total Annual Labor Cost ($) for Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant is $360,400

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Cedar Rapids total labor cost is "$824,865". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Cedar Rapids total annual labor cost is $360,400; fail because the stated amount differs.

  4. States that the Efficiency Gains ($) for Rockford, Illinois Plant is $60,752

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Rockford efficiency gains are "$207,293". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Rockford efficiency gains are $60,752; fail because the stated amount differs.

  5. States that the Efficiency Gains ($) for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is $80,466

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Madison efficiency gains are "$164,932". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Madison efficiency gains are $80,466; fail because the stated amount differs.

  6. States that the Efficiency Gains ($) for Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant is $40,151

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Cedar Rapids efficiency gains are "$82,486". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Cedar Rapids efficiency gains are $40,151; fail because the stated amount differs.

  7. States that the Total Forecasted Labor Cost Increase from Union Demand ($) for Rockford, Illinois Plant is $13,122

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Rockford forecasted increase from union demand is "$41,836". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Rockford forecasted increase is $13,122; fail because the stated amount differs.

  8. States that the Total Forecasted Labor Cost Increase from Union Demand ($) for Madison, Wisconsin Plant is $5,793

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Madison forecasted increase from union demand is "$14,165". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Madison forecasted increase is $5,793; fail because the stated amount differs.

  9. States that the Total Forecasted Labor Cost Increase from Union Demand ($) for Cedar Rapids, Iowa Plant is $6,346

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table states Cedar Rapids forecasted increase from union demand is "$27,546". Assessment: Criterion requires stating Cedar Rapids forecasted increase is $6,346; fail because the stated amount differs.