Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Digital Transformation

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

world130_HO_05

5/5Pass

APEX-Agents task world130_HO_05 in AI Agents for Digital Transformation. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Digital TransformationManagement Consulting World 130Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_dba0d3217ada47eb93028eed8e14d69d
Management Consulting World 130
message_in_console
5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Use the v1 version of the survey responses to identify the number of respondents who received any kind of training on digital tools. Of those respondents, return the percentage of respondents for each training quality rating. Reply back here to me.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual5/5Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal5/5Pass
GPT-5.4dual5/5Pass
GPT-5.4 minidual5/5Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual5/5Pass

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the number of respondents who received any kind of training on digital tools is 1200

    Pass

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> says, “Total respondents who received any digital-tools training: 1,200.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating the number is 1200; pass.

  2. States that percentage of respondents rated the training quality as "Excellent- comprehensive and very helpful” is 16%

    Pass

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists “Excellent - comprehensive and very helpful | 187 | 15.58%.” Assessment: Criterion requires 16%; 15.58% rounds to 16% at whole-percent precision, so pass.

  3. States that percentage of respondents rated the training quality as "Good- adequate for most needs” is 41%

    Pass

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists “Good - adequate for most needs | 496 | 41.33%.” Assessment: Criterion requires 41%; 41.33% rounds to 41% at whole-percent precision, so pass.

  4. States that percentage of respondents rated the training quality as “Fair- some gaps or inconsistencies” is 33%

    Pass

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists “Fair - some gaps or inconsistencies | 390 | 32.50%.” Assessment: Criterion requires 33%; 32.50% rounds to 33% at whole-percent precision, so pass.

  5. States that percentage of respondents rated the training quality as “Poor - insufficient or unhelpful” is 11%

    Pass

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists “Poor - insufficient or unhelpful | 127 | 10.58%.” Assessment: Criterion requires 11%; 10.58% rounds to 11% at whole-percent precision, so pass.