Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Consumer Growth Strategy

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World132_DA_Task04

1/6Fail

APEX-Agents task World132_DA_Task04 in AI Agents for Consumer Growth Strategy. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Consumer Growth StrategyManagement Consulting World 132Dual harnessGrader: rubric
Task IDtask_b308f1c02b15494db5dfecb5583eed43
WorldManagement Consulting World 132
Expected outputmessage_in_console
Published runs5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Analyze market entry priorities using the Pricing Corridor Score methodology for PureLife’s Supplements strateg. Identify the Top 3 Markets with the highest Pricing Corridor Score under the weighted methodology using the following components: Price Elasticity Score (35%), Willingness‑to‑Pay Score (35%), and Cost Efficiency Score (30%). Show both the Market Name and its corresponding Score for the Top 3 Markets. Format percentages to 0.01%. Round all numbers and intermediate calculations to two decimals. Output the answers as a message right here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual1/6FailShare pagePublic trace
Gemini 3.1 Produal1/6FailShare pagePublic trace
GPT-5.4dual2/6FailShare pagePublic trace
GPT-5.4 minidual0/6FailShare pagePublic trace
GPT-5.4 nanodual2/6FailShare pagePublic trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the market ranked first is Brazil

    Pass

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Rank 1 as “Brazil” with score “78.47%.” Assessment: Criterion “States that the market ranked first is Brazil” is met because the response clearly ranks Brazil first.

  2. States that the market ranked second is China

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Rank 2 as “Germany” and Rank 3 as “China.” Assessment: Criterion “States that the market ranked second is China” is not met; China is stated as third, not second.

  3. States that the market ranked third is Mexico

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists the Top 3 as Brazil, Germany, and China; “Mexico” does not appear. Assessment: Criterion “States that the market ranked third is Mexico” is not met.

  4. States the Pricing Corridor Score for Brazil is 8.54

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> states Brazil’s Pricing Corridor Score is “78.47%.” Assessment: Criterion “States the Pricing Corridor Score for Brazil is 8.54” is not met; the provided score differs from 8.54.

  5. States the Pricing Corridor Score for China is 8.17

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> states China’s Pricing Corridor Score is “73.18%.” Assessment: Criterion “States the Pricing Corridor Score for China is 8.17” is not met; the provided score differs from 8.17.

  6. States the Pricing Corridor Score for Mexico is 7.22

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> does not list Mexico among the Top 3 or provide any Mexico score. Assessment: Criterion “States the Pricing Corridor Score for Mexico is 7.22” is not met.