Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Tariff and Trade Law Analysis

APEX-Agents · Management Consulting

World132_DA_Task05

0/4Fail

APEX-Agents task World132_DA_Task05 in AI Agents for Tariff and Trade Law Analysis. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Tariff and Trade Law AnalysisManagement Consulting World 132Dual harnessGrader: rubric
Task IDtask_3e7800abdba24ed5bbc956024114d229
WorldManagement Consulting World 132
Expected outputmessage_in_console
Published runs5 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Analyse market cost efficiency using the Cost Structure Score methodology for PureLife’s Vitamins strategy: - Calculate the Total Cost Structure Score for each market under the weighted methodology using the following components: Import Cost Score (35%), Distribution Cost Score (35%), and Total Cost Load Score (30%). - Show the country with the highest cumulative cost structure score and the country with the lowest cumulative cost structure score, with each entry showing the market name and corresponding score side by side (e.g., China – 3.81). Format percentages to 0.01%. Round all numbers and intermediate calculations to two decimals. Output the answer in here.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual0/4FailShare pagePublic trace
Gemini 3.1 Produal0/4FailShare pagePublic trace
GPT-5.4dual0/4FailShare pagePublic trace
GPT-5.4 minidual0/4FailShare pagePublic trace
GPT-5.4 nanodual0/4FailShare pagePublic trace

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States the highest Total Cost Structure Score is 4.47

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> table lists Total Cost Structure Scores including "UK ... 4.60" and summary states "Japan – 4.79" as highest. Assessment: Criterion requires stating the highest Total Cost Structure Score is 4.47; the response does not state 4.47 and instead identifies 4.79, so fail.

  2. States the market with the highest Total Cost Structure Score is the UK

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> summary table says "Highest cumulative score" is "Japan – 4.79". Assessment: Criterion requires stating the highest Total Cost Structure Score market is the UK; the response states Japan, so fail.

  3. States the lowest Total Cost Structure Score is 2.81

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> summary table says "Lowest cumulative score" is "Brazil – 1.28". Assessment: Criterion requires stating the lowest Total Cost Structure Score is 2.81; the response does not state 2.81 and instead gives 1.28, so fail.

  4. States the market with the lowest Total Cost Structure Score is India

    Fail

    Evidence: <TEXT_RESPONSE> summary table says "Lowest cumulative score" is "Brazil – 1.28". Assessment: Criterion requires stating the lowest Total Cost Structure Score market is India; the response states Brazil, so fail.