Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring

APEX-Agents · Law

World418_EK_01

3/5Fail

APEX-Agents task World418_EK_01 in AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal Structuring. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Joint Venture Legal StructuringLaw World 418Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_08c22c6bd072423284c2da7fb190b8bd
Law World 418
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Does assigning the shipbuilding contract to the JV require any other member consents (under the JV Operating Agreement) that we don't already have? Write out your answer to me here, and give a short reason to justify it.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual3/5Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual5/5Pass
Gemini 3 Flashdual4/5Fail
Gemini 3.1 Produal3/5Fail
GPT-5.4dual4/5Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual4/5Fail
GPT-5.4 nanodual5/5Pass

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States No, assigning the shipbuilding contract to the JV does not require any other member consents under the JV Operating Agreement

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says, “No. Assigning the shipbuilding contract to the JV does **not** appear to require any additional Member consent under the JV Operating Agreement...” Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states no other member consents are required under the JV Operating Agreement; pass because this is stated clearly, with a qualification about no amendment.

  2. States that the assignment of the shipbuilding contract is LNG Shipping's initial capital contribution to the joint venture

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says the OA “already contemplates LNG Shipping contributing the assignment of the shipbuilding contract to the Company” and quotes “LNG Shipping has agreed to contribute to the Company the assignment of rights under a shipbuilding contract.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states assignment is LNG Shipping's initial capital contribution. The response states contribution but does not explicitly say “initial capital contribution”; however, it clearly conveys LNG Shipping is contributing the assignment to the JV as the relevant contribution. Pass.

  3. States that accepting initial capital contributions is not a reserved matter under the Joint Venture Operating Agreement

    Fail

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states the OA contemplates the contribution and that the “relevant unanimous-Member-consent trigger is for ‘modifying terms to the shipbuilding contract,’” but it does not mention reserved matters or state that accepting initial capital contributions is not a reserved matter. Assessment: Criterion specifically asks for a statement that accepting initial capital contributions is not a reserved matter under the JV Operating Agreement; fail because this point is not expressly stated or clearly paraphrased.

  4. States that accepting initial capital contributions does not require any further member consent under the JV Operating Agreement

    Fail

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE concludes “I do not see a separate OA Member consent still needed for the assignment itself” and “does not appear to require any additional Member consent,” but does not specifically discuss “accepting initial capital contributions.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states that accepting initial capital contributions does not require further member consent. The response gives that conclusion for the assignment itself, not for accepting initial capital contributions as such; fail.

  5. States that the Joint Venture Operating Agreement does not impose additional member consent requirements for accepting the the assignment of the shipbuilding contract

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says “No... does **not** appear to require any additional Member consent under the JV Operating Agreement” and “I do not see a separate OA Member consent still needed for the assignment itself.” Assessment: Criterion asks whether it states the JV Operating Agreement does not impose additional member consent requirements for accepting the assignment of the shipbuilding contract; pass because the response clearly states no separate/additional OA consent is needed for the assignment.