Raycaster / evalsBack to AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental Liability

APEX-Agents · Law

World419_DM_02

1/3Fail

APEX-Agents task World419_DM_02 in AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental Liability. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.

AI Agents for Maritime and Environmental LiabilityLaw World 419Dual harnessGrader: rubric
task_410408825872453bacd57f4ba8a3ae0a
Law World 419
message_in_console
7 models · dual config

Task prompt

What the agent was asked to do

Evaluate the maximum total potential liability for Star Tankers International Ltd. compared to Cooper/Jeffries Energy Corporation under the Oil Pollution Act for the incident with the M/V Red Room. Draft a message to me here, stating which entity has a greater liability if found to be the sole responsible party for the incident with the M/V Red Room. Calculate and include the potential maximum liability for each party. Give the values in 100s. Use the BLPL Claim Summary, the relevant legal authority, and the Hull and Machinery Survey for your analysis.

Published trajectories

Agent runs on this task

Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.

ModelHarnessScoreResultLinks
GPT-5.5showcasedual1/3Fail
fireworks models Kimi K2dual1/3Fail
Gemini 3 Flashdual3/3Pass
Gemini 3.1 Produal3/3Pass
GPT-5.4dual1/3Fail
GPT-5.4 minidual3/3Pass
GPT-5.4 nanodual3/3Pass

Grading rubric

Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)

  1. States that the maximum potential liability for Star Tankers International Ltd. under the Oil Pollution Act is $56,709,300

    Pass

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states, “if Star Tankers is the sole responsible party and remains entitled to OPA limitation, its maximum potential OPA liability is $56,709,300” and shows “29,847 GT × $1,900 = $56,709,300.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Star Tankers’ maximum potential liability under OPA is $56,709,300; pass.

  2. States that the maximum potential liability for Cooper/Jeffries Energy Corporation under the Oil Pollution Act is $56,709,300

    Fail

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says for Cooper/Jeffries, “its maximum exposure would be the full BLPL Claim Summary amount: $144,140,000,” and the bottom line says “Cooper/Jeffries has the greater potential maximum liability… $144,140,000.” It only adds conditionally, “If a court instead treats Cooper/Jeffries as subject to the same OPA tank-vessel cap… $56,709,300.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating Cooper/Jeffries’ maximum potential liability under OPA is $56,709,300; the response’s actual conclusion is $144,140,000, so fail.

  3. States that neither Star Tankers International Ltd. nor Cooper/Jeffries Energy Corporation have greater potential liability under the Oil Pollution Act as their maximum liability is equal

    Fail

    Evidence: TEXT_RESPONSE concludes, “Bottom line: Cooper/Jeffries has the greater potential maximum liability… $144,140,000 versus Star Tankers’ capped $56,709,300.” It includes only a caveat that if Cooper/Jeffries gets the same cap, “the capped amount would be the same.” Assessment: Criterion requires stating neither entity has greater potential liability because their maximum liability is equal; the response states Cooper/Jeffries is greater, so fail.