APEX-Agents · Law
World431_AVK_04
APEX-Agents task World431_AVK_04 in AI Agents for Real Estate Lease Review. Compare dual-harness agent runs across models — rubric criteria, scores, and public traces.
Task prompt
What the agent was asked to do
Is Agility Tech Solutions LLC's notice to extend the Term of the Lease valid? Please return to me a short explanation based on the lease provisions in your answer, thanks!
Published trajectories
Agent runs on this task
Curated dual-harness runs (parsed + original sandbox). Best scored run per model.
| Model | Harness | Score | Result | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.5showcase | dual | 5/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| fireworks models Kimi K2 | dual | 3/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro | dual | 5/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 | dual | 5/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 mini | dual | 6/6 | Pass | Share pagePublic trace |
| GPT-5.4 nano | dual | 5/6 | Fail | Share pagePublic trace |
Grading rubric
Criteria and grader verdict (showcase run)
States Yes, Agility Tech Solutions LLC's notice to extend the Term of the Lease is valid
PassEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says, “Yes—Agility Tech Solutions, LLC’s notice appears valid under the lease documents.” Assessment: The criterion asks whether it states Yes, the notice is valid; pass because the response clearly answers yes, with qualifications about default/assignment.
States that Agility Tech Solutions LLC has the authority to extend the lease
PassEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says “Agility also appears entitled to exercise because the assignment transferred to Agility ‘all of Assignor’s right, title, and interest…’ with Lessor’s consent.” Assessment: The criterion asks whether it states Agility has authority to extend; pass because entitlement to exercise the extension option is clearly stated.
States all of the following timelines for exercising Agility Tech Solutions LLC's notice to extend the Term of the Lease: (1) no earlier than 12 months prior to November 1, 2030 and (2) no later than 9 months following November 1, 2030
FailEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states the lease requires notice “no earlier than twelve (12) months and no later than nine (9) months prior to the expiration,” and gives the window “November 1, 2029 through February 1, 2030.” Assessment: The criterion specifically requires both “no earlier than 12 months prior to November 1, 2030” and “no later than 9 months following November 1, 2030.” The response states the first concept but says nine months prior, not nine months following November 1, 2030; fail as written.
States that Agility Tech Solutions LLC's notice to extend the Term of the Lease complied with the timing requirements to provide such notice
PassEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says “Agility’s notice is dated ‘December 1, 2029,’ so it is timely.” Assessment: The criterion asks whether it states the notice complied with timing requirements; pass because the response explicitly states the notice was timely.
States at least one of the following regarding the delivery of Agility Tech Solutions LLC's notice to extend the Term of the Lease: (1) that the notice was delivered in writing; (2) that the notice was delivered to the proper address; and (3) that the notice was delivered via a nationally recognized overnight courier
PassEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE says “The notice method also appears compliant: the Lease allows notice by ‘nationally recognized overnight courier (e.g., FedEx),’ and the notice states ‘Via FedEx.’” Assessment: The criterion requires at least one delivery fact, including delivery via nationally recognized overnight courier; pass because FedEx/overnight courier is addressed.
States that Agility Tech Solutions LLC's notice to extend the Term of the Lease complied with the delivery requirements to provide such notice
PassEvidence: TEXT_RESPONSE states, “The notice method also appears compliant,” after explaining the lease permits a nationally recognized overnight courier and the notice states “Via FedEx.” Assessment: The criterion asks whether it states compliance with delivery requirements; pass because the response explicitly characterizes the delivery method as compliant.