APEX-Agents · GPT-5.4 nano · dual
LawWorld417_AB_01
GPT-5.4 nano on APEX-Agents: LawWorld417_AB_01 (dual harness). Browse score, rubric, and public trace.
Grader rubric
Criteria verdict
States that Chasing Streams will be successful in its motion to dismiss
States that Angeles was terminated
States that on termination Angeles immediately filed his lawsuit against Chasing Streams
States that the ADA and its implementing regulations require a plaintiff to obtain a "right to sue" letter before they can file suit
States that in order to obtain a "right to sue" letter, a plaintiff must file a charge of discrimination with the EEOC or the state/local agency
States that Angeles did not file a charge of discrimination with the EEOC or state/local agency
States that Angeles did not obtain a "right to sue" letter
Prompt excerpt
Task context
We are working on the Angeles case. He is the custodian who sued Chasing Streams under the ADA based on his termination and failure to accommodate. It's the one where he made a verbal request, but Chasing Streams never addressed it. What are our chances on a motion to dismiss? Explain why. Give your reply here.
Response trace
Agent response, tools, files, and edits
On mobile, open the full trace for the best view of the agent response, tool calls, file reads, edits, and grading context.
Open mobile trace